Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Oh the Tangled Webs We Weave

Social Myths

Myths have muddied the waters between fact and fiction since the time of Plato and the Sophists who transformed the Homeric significance of myth away from “truth” and toward a more complex meaning of, as anthropologist Talal Asad has put it, “a socially useful lie”(Wright 3).

Asad defines a myth quite nicely when he states it as “a socially useful lie.” As discussed in class, myths are created over time and lead people to believe in stereotypes and dominant discourses. The people in charge, factory bosses or those in powerful, governmental positions, create the dominant discourses, which are large-scale ideas that often define a groups of people. These dominant discourses are made up of stereotypes. They are used in order to maintain power and control over a group and can be compiled to prove a social myth.

Rhetorical Devices

In relation to rhetoric, the person in power uses rhetorical tropes in order to persuade a group of people to believe in the dominant discourse they are creating and ultimately, the myth. Some of the most basic tropes include ethos, logos and pathos. Ethos establishes credibility in an argument. This can be done by including testimony from a credible source or statistics. Logos is a logical appeal. This is evident in a speech or paper by outlining an argument in a progressive, logical order, with clear transitions. Finally, pathos is an emotional appeal. This establishes credibility by showing the audience that the speaker or writer has gone through a certain situation or experienced a hardship that shows through with their language and passion.

Practical Application

When establishing a myth, these tools are important in order to persuade the audience of the importance of the idea. One example discussed heavily in class was the disposability of women. This myth states that women are great, disposable workers because they can be worked into the ground for a period of 1-3 years before needing to be replaced. While this seems a little off, many companies have taken it to heart.
This idea stems from the “facts” that women are weaker than men, are ruled by their biological clocks and can be taken advantage of. While women aren’t always physically stronger than men, they possess a strong worth ethic and can work for longer than two years in a factory if not pushed to the most extreme limits. This is where the bosses establish the myth though. They push the female workers as far as possible, run them into the ground to the point where they have to be forced out or quit. Another popular thought is that women are ruled by their biological clock and want to have families and will get pregnant while working. This cannot happen in a factory setting because if a woman becomes pregnant, at some point she will have to slow down in production, and eventually have to leave the job. Finally, it’s believed that women are easily taken advantage of, and that fear can be used to maintain power.
With all of these ideas, the disposability of women has been established. With men in power and creating these ideas, female workers have been subjected to no job security and have been taken advantage of. They use ethos in their argument by using science to show women are physically weaker than men. Logic is employed by compiling facts and statistics to prove their overarching idea. Finally, women are nurturing people who want a family; in this way pathos is applied. They would not sacrifice a family for a job. Rhetoric establishes social myth. Various tropes can be employed in order to create these myths, including ethos, logos and pathos. By combining all of these elements a very strong basis for argument is established and often times accepted.

Saturday, March 13, 2010

When the Written Meets the Visual


Visual Rhetoric

While the written word has stood the test of time, acknowledging visual rhetoric is important in regards to globalization. With a focus on visuals, photos of Katrina, political cartoons and even graphs, it’s important to understand the influence that images can have on an issue. People want to see what’s going on, not have to read a five page article detailing a situation. Also, visuals allow the creator the opportunity to showcase what they want people to see and convey their message quickly and easily. They hit an emotional nerve in many cases because a photo is rarely emotionally neutral; it tends to evoke some sort of feeling in the viewer. Words, on the other hand, can be grouped together in a more neutral way, without a passionate tone or word choice.

Visual rhetoric isn’t strictly images though. It can also include text, as with political cartoons and advertisements. This allows for explanation and background on the image, so the viewer isn’t confused as to what they’re looking at. This specific visual shows how the two can be blended to show a creator’s view on globalization.

Visual and Written Rhetoric: A Dynamic Duo

By implementing both visual and textual elements, a certain opinion can be communicated quickly and easily. While straight text is more informative, offering more details, references and information, it can also be very dry and discourage people from reading. Straight visual rhetoric can be flashy, interesting and useful, but only if it doesn’t leave itself open to too much interpretation.

Using both visual and written elements to express an opinion allows the author the ability to communicate exactly what they want to convey to their audience. In this example of a political drawing, without the words, it would simply be a picture of a map, without the map, it would just be oddly placed words.

Connection to Class and Globalization

During class, videos and articles have been discussed, regarding large companies. How these companies spread, how they treat their employees and more importantly, how they affect the countries they are in. The videos and articles have explored the treatment of workers in China and Mexico, the spread of corporate companies in other countries, overtaking the local vendors and personal stories from the people affected.
There have been many instances when these companies do more harm than good for a country, but there are also a few cases where individuals have benefitted from a large company coming into their town. This picture clearly shows the harm being done by large companies and corporations.

It also discusses something that hasn’t been explored much in class yet, which is where materials come from. In the picture, Argentina is labeled with Whoppers and Big Macs, Argentina being known for some of the best meat in the world. Brazil, home of many rainforests, is labeled as the place for lumber. Factory farms are shown in the United States, where cheap meat can be produced for consumption. All of these try to convey that prized meat should be treated as more than fast food hamburger, that wood should not be taken from the rainforests and factory farms are taking over too large of an area.

Labor and political strife is highlighted on the map as well. Where unions rule and where cheap labor is abundant is focused on. Also, which countries have political problems, wars and in the United States, voting demographics are outlined.

Overall, the use of both a visual and textual elements is important to attract the reader. In this case, the skewed map attracts the viewer and the descriptions keep them looking.

HERE

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Test Post

HERE to open the feedback tool.">